Follow us on Twitter @LiquipediaRL if you'd like to be kept up to date on all things Rocket League!

Liquipedia Rating: Current

From Liquipedia Rocket League Wiki

Explanation[edit]

What is it?[edit]

Our main goal was to create a rating of all the teams that is based purely on data and therefore not subjective. The rating should reflect the current form of a team and make it possible to rank teams accordingly. In addition we also want it to be able to do this across regions with at least somewhat precise results. This is where LPRating comes in!

How does it work?[edit]

There are a lot of rating algorithms out there with probably the most prominent one being Elo. Elo was developed by Arpad Elo in 1960 to create an objective rating algorithm for the US chess federation USCF. It proved to be so successful that it was subsequently used worldwide. So, is LPRating just another iteration of Elo?

A little bit, but not quite.

Elo is a really interesting algorithm which fits for a lot of sports, but for numerous reasons, it doesn't fully work for Rocket League:

  • Elo is so accurate because so many players are ranked. Rocket League in comparison has a very limited number of teams that are consistently playing matches and appear in our database. Mostly RLCS, RLRS and some bubble teams from each region, but nothing compared to 360,000+ in chess rating.
  • Elo needs teams to play each other often and needs enough matches across skill gaps and regions. In Rocket League, especially cross regional tournaments are rare.
  • Elo is based on the assumption that a contenders skill is fairly constant, at least over short periods of time. In Rocket League, form can drastically change quickly. Even daily form can make the difference of a low tier team beating the higher tier one.
  • Elo always has even win- and loss-modifiers, which means that every point gained by a team is the loss of another one. Looking at Rocket League, this would create a problem for teams in Premier tournaments like RLCS. If the rating is designed to react to form fast, teams could potentially lose a lot of points during a season to allow gains for in form teams - but a team going 1-6 in RLCS is still probably top 10 in their region.

Considering these constraints, we made several changes to the Elo-Alogrithm to allow rating Rocket League in a more accurate fashion, which all come together as the LPRating.

Which results are included?[edit]

The LPRating includes all matches on Liquipedia, starting from September 2017. All tiers besides show match are included, but higher tiers like S-Tier (RLCS, ELEAGUE) and A-Tier (RLRS, DreamHack) are given more weight.

Recent Updates[edit]

  • April 6th: the rating algorithm has been updated. About details, find out more here.
  • April 26th: fixed a bug that caused teams gaining 2.5x the intended points for winning major matches (including the RLSS), adjusted some tournament weights
  • October 26th: fixed a bug that caused teams to lose too many points for losses at S-Tier tournaments

The Rating[edit]

#Team
LPR
REG
STR
30D
1
3067
EU
-
-
2
2955
NA
4W
-
3
2840
NA
3W
▲3
4
2816
EU
-
-
5
2782
NA
-
▼2
6
2765
NA
-
▼1
7
2676
EU
4W
▲2
8
2655
EU
2L
▼1
9
2639
OCE
10W
▲5
10
2610
NA
3W
▲2
11
2605
EU
3W
▲17
12
2545
EU
-
▲1
13
2541
EU
-
▲3
14
2482
EU
-
▼4
15
2461
NA
-
-
16
2461
NA
-
▼5
17
2415
OCE
-
▲7
18
2410
OCE
-
▲8
19
2402
NA
-
▲1
20
2401
EU
-
▼3
21
2398
NA
-
▲2
22
2376
NA
2W
▲12
23
2362
NA
-
▲4
24
2340
NA
2L
▼2
25
2337
EU
3W
▼6
26
2325
NA
-
New
27
2322
SAM
-
▼2
28
2311
EU
4L
▼10
29
2296
NA
-
-
30
2266
SAM
-
▲5
31
2258
OCE
-
New
32
2230
EU
-
▼1
33
2229
OCE
-
▼1
34
2222
EU
3W
▲5
35
2201
EU
2W
New
36
2179
OCE
-
New
37
2138
EU
-
New
38
2113
SAM
2L
-
39
2090
EU
3W
New
40
2075
NA
-
-
#Team
LPR
REG
STR
30D
1
3067
EU
-
-
2
2816
EU
-
-
3
2676
EU
4W
▲2
4
2655
EU
2L
▼1
5
2605
EU
3W
▲8
6
2545
EU
-
▲1
7
2541
EU
-
▲1
8
2482
EU
-
▼2
9
2401
EU
-
-
10
2337
EU
3W
▲1
11
2311
EU
4L
▼1
12
2230
EU
-
▲2
13
2222
EU
3W
▲3
14
2201
EU
2W
New
15
2138
EU
-
▲3
16
2090
EU
3W
▲12
17
2026
EU
-
▼13
18
1949
EU
6W
▲4
19
1941
EU
-
-
20
1832
EU
-
▲3
21
1725
EU
4W
▲5
22
1706
EU
2L
▲5
23
1694
EU
-
New
24
1640
EU
4L
▲5
25
1622
EU
11W
▲5
26
1620
EU
-
▲5
27
1597
EU
-
▲5
28
1580
EU
5W
New
29
1577
EU
9L
New
30
1549
EU
-
▲8
31
1505
EU
2L
▲4
32
1497
EU
-
▲4
33
1492
EU
-
▲1
34
1477
EU
-
▲3
35
1450
EU
2L
▲4
36
1433
EU
-
New
37
1408
EU
-
New
38
1404
EU
2L
New
39
1396
EU
2L
New
40
1375
EU
-
New
#Team
LPR
REG
STR
30D
1
2955
NA
4W
-
2
2840
NA
3W
▲2
3
2782
NA
-
▼1
4
2765
NA
-
▼1
5
2610
NA
3W
▲1
6
2461
NA
-
▲1
7
2461
NA
-
▼2
8
2402
NA
-
-
9
2398
NA
-
▲1
10
2376
NA
2W
▲4
11
2362
NA
-
-
12
2340
NA
2L
▼3
13
2325
NA
-
▲14
14
2296
NA
-
▼2
15
2075
NA
-
▲1
16
2051
NA
2L
▲4
17
2014
NA
-
▲4
18
2011
NA
2L
-
19
2000
NA
-
▼2
20
1933
NA
3L
▲11
21
1827
NA
-
New
22
1795
NA
-
▲2
23
1768
NA
3L
▼1
24
1764
NA
2L
▲5
25
1720
NA
2L
New
26
1718
NA
5W
New
27
1682
NA
2W
New
28
1591
NA
2L
▲9
29
1559
NA
12W
New
30
1514
NA
2L
▲3
31
1511
NA
3W
New
32
1500
NA
6W
New
33
1492
NA
3W
New
34
1464
NA
2L
-
35
1458
NA
5L
-
36
1442
NA
3W
-
37
1441
NA
2L
▲1
38
1428
NA
2L
New
39
1414
NA
-
New
40
1413
NA
-
New
#Team
LPR
REG
STR
30D
1
2639
OCE
10W
-
2
2415
OCE
-
-
3
2410
OCE
-
-
4
2258
OCE
-
▲7
5
2229
OCE
-
▼1
6
2179
OCE
-
-
7
2030
OCE
-
New
8
2002
OCE
-
-
9
1984
OCE
2W
▲13
10
1884
OCE
-
▲15
11
1868
OCE
-
New
12
1836
OCE
-
New
13
1831
OCE
4L
▲2
14
1783
OCE
-
▲4
15
1682
OCE
3W
New
16
1673
OCE
-
New
17
1584
OCE
2W
New
18
1573
OCE
2L
New
19
1561
OCE
2L
New
20
1515
OCE
-
New
21
1476
OCE
2L
▲14
22
1475
OCE
7L
New
23
1427
OCE
5W
▲7
24
1405
OCE
2L
▲4
25
1402
OCE
-
New
26
1391
OCE
-
▲3
27
1387
OCE
5L
▲6
28
1378
OCE
2L
▲3
29
1360
OCE
2L
▲5
30
1356
OCE
2L
▲6
31
1322
OCE
-
▲8
32
1311
OCE
-
New
33
1308
OCE
-
New
34
1306
OCE
5L
▲6
35
1282
OCE
5L
New
36
1281
OCE
-
New
37
1250
OCE
14L
New
#Team
LPR
REG
STR
30D
1
2322
SAM
-
-
2
2266
SAM
-
-
3
2113
SAM
2L
-
4
2030
SAM
3W
-
5
1953
SAM
3W
▲4
6
1804
SAM
-
-
7
1741
SAM
3W
New
8
1727
SAM
4W
▲4
9
1713
SAM
-
▲1
10
1639
SAM
2L
New
11
1604
SAM
2L
New
12
1578
SAM
3W
▼5
13
1547
SAM
-
▲9
14
1520
SAM
-
New
15
1467
SAM
4W
▲6
16
1444
SAM
-
▲3
17
1419
SAM
-
New
18
1386
SAM
7L
-

See more teams[edit]

This page only shows the top 40 globally. For more, see the full global rating.