Follow us on Twitter @LiquipediaRL if you'd like to be kept up to date on all things Rocket League!

Liquipedia Rating: Current

From Liquipedia Rocket League Wiki

Explanation[edit]

What is it?[edit]

Our main goal was to create a rating of all the teams that is based purely on data and therefore not subjective. The rating should reflect the current form of a team and make it possible to rank teams accordingly. In addition we also want it to be able to do this across regions with at least somewhat precise results. This is where LPRating comes in!

How does it work?[edit]

There are a lot of rating algorithms out there with probably the most prominent one being Elo. Elo was developed by Arpad Elo in 1960 to create an objective rating algorithm for the US chess federation USCF. It proved to be so successful that it was subsequently used worldwide. So, is LPRating just another iteration of Elo?

A little bit, but not quite.

Elo is a really interesting algorithm which fits for a lot of sports, but for numerous reasons, it doesn't fully work for Rocket League:

  • Elo is so accurate because so many players are ranked. Rocket League in comparison has a very limited number of teams that are consistently playing matches and appear in our database. Mostly RLCS, RLRS and some bubble teams from each region, but nothing compared to 360,000+ in chess rating.
  • Elo needs teams to play each other often and needs enough matches across skill gaps and regions. In Rocket League, especially cross regional tournaments are rare.
  • Elo is based on the assumption that a contenders skill is fairly constant, at least over short periods of time. In Rocket League, form can drastically change quickly. Even daily form can make the difference of a low tier team beating the higher tier one.
  • Elo always has even win- and loss-modifiers, which means that every point gained by a team is the loss of another one. Looking at Rocket League, this would create a problem for teams in Premier tournaments like RLCS. If the rating is designed to react to form fast, teams could potentially lose a lot of points during a season to allow gains for in form teams - but a team going 1-6 in RLCS is still probably top 10 in their region.

Considering these constraints, we made several changes to the Elo-Alogrithm to allow rating Rocket League in a more accurate fashion, which all come together as the LPRating.

Which results are included?[edit]

The LPRating includes all matches on Liquipedia, starting from September 2017. All tiers besides show match are included, but higher tiers like S-Tier (RLCS, ELEAGUE) and A-Tier (RLRS, DreamHack) are given more weight.

Recent Updates[edit]

2020[edit]

  • April 6th: The rating algorithm has been updated. About details, find out more here.
  • April 26th: Fixed a bug that caused teams gaining 2.5x the intended points for winning major matches (including the RLSS), adjusted some tournament weights
  • October 26th: Fixed a bug that caused teams to lose too many points for losses at S-Tier tournaments
  • December 17th: Disabled global rating, as comparability between regions is lacking caused by the current absence of LANs

2021[edit]

  • March 30th: Included tier2 data for Weeklies, Monthlies and Qualifiers

The Rating[edit]

To see the details, you can visit the details pages of each region: EUNAOCESAM

#Team
LPR
REG
STR
30D
1
2922
EU
6W
-
2
2628
EU
-
-
3
2608
EU
-
-
4
2553
EU
3W
▲7
5
2443
EU
-
▼1
6
2434
EU
4W
▲6
7
2416
EU
-
▲1
8
2401
EU
5L
▼2
9
2396
EU
-
▲5
10
2382
EU
3L
New
11
2364
EU
7L
▼6
12
2351
EU
-
▼5
13
2345
EU
-
▲2
14
2312
EU
-
▼4
15
2241
EU
-
New
16
2130
EU
5W
▲4
17
2115
EU
-
▲4
18
2104
EU
2L
New
19
2043
EU
2L
▼3
20
2015
EU
2L
▲13
21
1947
EU
4W
▼4
22
1905
EU
5L
▲16
23
1893
EU
4L
▼4
24
1835
EU
-
▼11
25
1818
EU
3L
New
26
1765
EU
-
▼2
27
1728
EU
3W
▼4
28
1722
EU
2L
▲1
29
1701
EU
3L
▼7
30
1694
EU
2W
▼3
31
1668
EU
3W
▼3
32
1656
EU
3L
▼7
33
1635
EU
2L
▼7
34
1623
EU
-
-
35
1610
EU
-
▼4
36
1608
EU
2W
▼6
37
1607
EU
2L
-
38
1576
EU
-
▼6
39
1568
EU
-
▼3
40
1524
EU
2L
New
#Team
LPR
REG
STR
30D
1
2969
NA
-
-
2
2820
NA
7W
▲4
3
2785
NA
5W
▲1
4
2763
NA
-
▼1
5
2755
NA
-
▼3
6
2571
NA
3W
▲4
7
2557
NA
-
New
8
2527
NA
3W
▲7
9
2519
NA
-
▼1
10
2423
NA
-
▼1
11
2297
NA
2L
▲3
12
2291
NA
2L
▲1
13
2252
NA
6L
▼2
14
2251
NA
-
▲4
15
2236
NA
3L
▼8
16
2213
NA
2L
▼4
17
2165
NA
-
-
18
2047
NA
4L
▲1
19
1970
NA
4L
▲1
20
1959
NA
4L
▲1
21
1896
NA
2L
▲1
22
1842
NA
2L
▲2
23
1838
NA
-
New
24
1742
NA
-
▲1
25
1736
NA
-
New
26
1714
NA
6L
▲2
27
1705
NA
-
▼1
28
1692
NA
-
▲1
29
1606
NA
-
▼2
30
1586
NA
3L
▲7
31
1557
NA
11W
New
32
1555
NA
10W
New
33
1554
NA
4L
New
34
1542
NA
3W
▼3
35
1535
NA
-
▼3
36
1533
NA
2L
New
37
1530
NA
-
▼1
38
1521
NA
2L
▼4
39
1518
NA
2L
New
40
1518
NA
2L
▼7
#Team
LPR
REG
STR
30D
1
2624
OCE
-
-
2
2574
OCE
3W
▲2
3
2486
OCE
2W
▼1
4
2310
OCE
5L
▲1
5
2310
OCE
2L
▼2
6
2259
OCE
-
-
7
2243
OCE
-
New
8
2202
OCE
-
New
9
2007
OCE
3L
▼1
10
1912
OCE
-
▲5
11
1890
OCE
2L
▼2
12
1849
OCE
-
▲11
13
1810
OCE
-
New
14
1771
OCE
-
New
15
1691
OCE
-
▼3
16
1685
OCE
3W
New
17
1661
OCE
-
New
18
1639
OCE
2L
▼5
19
1533
OCE
2L
New
20
1516
OCE
-
▼13
21
1514
OCE
-
▼3
22
1511
OCE
-
New
23
1504
OCE
3L
New
24
1493
OCE
2L
▼3
25
1474
OCE
3L
▼5
26
1440
OCE
2L
New
27
1363
OCE
-
▼2
28
1303
OCE
-
▼4
29
1282
OCE
3L
▼3
30
1265
OCE
2L
New
31
1259
OCE
7L
▼4
32
1250
OCE
14L
▼3
#Team
LPR
REG
STR
30D
1
2546
SAM
2L
-
2
2503
SAM
8W
▲1
3
2481
SAM
-
New
4
2282
SAM
-
▲1
5
2275
SAM
-
▼1
6
2203
SAM
2L
-
7
1990
SAM
-
-
8
1972
SAM
-
New
9
1943
SAM
-
New
10
1930
SAM
2W
▼1
11
1904
SAM
3L
New
12
1747
SAM
2L
New
13
1719
SAM
2L
New
14
1715
SAM
-
New
15
1705
SAM
4L
New
16
1668
SAM
2L
▼3
17
1667
SAM
2L
▼5
18
1518
SAM
5L
▼3
19
1490
SAM
-
▼1
20
1467
SAM
-
New

See more teams[edit]

This page only shows the top 40 globally. For more, see the full global rating.